With today being Independence Day here in the US, I have the day off and was able to stay up a little later than usual for a weeknight last night,which gave me the opportunity to try some modifications to my rules. Here is a report of what transpired:
Early 1945, Army Black is falling back as a drain of resources on both the Eastern and Western fronts has taken their toll. Somewhere in a forest, a Black platoon was ordered to hold a hill against an advancing Red tide.
Red platoons in columns. Green rectangles are Black Army blinds. |
In Company Fire, an HMG can op fire until it rolls two 1s. Then it's done until the next card is drawn. |
Meanwhile, on their right, the Reds advanced into position to assault the hill, but came under fire and holed up in the woods for an extended firefight. Forward observers for both sides played an important role on both flanks - but response for called fire missions was slow, hindering rapid action by either side.
At the first sign of advantage, the Reds charged the Black squad holding up their right-flank advance. Combat was fierce and decisive.
The victorious Red squads advanced only to under direct fire from the Black mortar located behind the crest of the hill. 50mm mortars rained down with devastating accuracy.
An overview of the Red advance and Black defensive positions. |
The Black rifle squad and mortar crumbled, leaving a single Black squad to slink back to their lines.
Final positions for Army Red. Only loss was one PL, compared to one PL, one HMG, two rifle squads, and one mortar. |
*****
The rules used were my own Company Fire,
EDIT: I have uploaded the version used for this game. The links are on the right hand side.
I was quite happy with how the most recent changes played out but the changes need to be incorporated into the "official" rules.
The scenario used was one of the 2x2 Crossfire Scenarios. The forces were as described there, minus minefields and engineers.
Total play time - including pictures and note taking - was a little over an hour, which is about right for a small scenario like this (2 platoons vs 1 platoon).
nice AAR.
ReplyDeleteWondering if you've considered dividing the hits among the platoons present in a square? So the difference of 6 would be 3 hits per squad, not 6 each.
Also, a rule I like from File Leader, is that you can decrease Hits inflicted against your unit by retreating. So perhaps each platoon could've taken 3 Hits [which would destroy them] but retreated 2 squares to reduce the Hits by 1, for 2 Hits each. Granted, they'd still be in trouble, but there is something to be said for an orderly retreat.
Just a couple of thoughts, looks like a fun time!
Dividing the close combat hits between all units on the receiving side is how I started out, but it wasn't working out to decisive close combats. Typically it was resulting in the defender being pinned. However, that was an earlier version of the close combat rules and I think that idea may merit a revisit.
DeleteI very much like that retreat option to reduce hits taken, at least for close combat - it gives the defending unit(s) a chance to live and fight another turn, rather than fighting to the bloody end. I wanted close assault to be decisive but not overwhelming it its effect.
Thank you again!