As PanGermania clashed with the 3rd Soviet Guard Rifle Division, Germany's Phantom Division led by General Feuerbach, was met by General Blavatsky's 2nd Soviet Guard Rifle Division.
It should be noted that on the map below, the Germans are entering from the South West, while the Soviets enter from the North East.
The Map. |
Portrait of a Soviet Hero: General Blavatsky. |
For their part, 2nd Panzer Regiment and the division artillery hammered away at the Soviet 5th Guard Rifle Regiment who had taken up position in the woods South West of the village, supported by the 2nd Anti-tank battalion. The Soviets proved difficult to dislodge and considerable time and effort were spent driving them from the woods so that PanGermania could approach the hills East of the road.
Some unpleasantness for 4th PanzerGrenadier Regiment. |
Campaign Notes
A nail biter with PanGermania reaching exhaustion first in turn 12. The Soviets tried to capture the NW hill and end it in turn 13, but German artillery fire cleared them from the hill, which coincidentally triggered exhaustion for the Soviets. At the end of the 13th turn both sides had reached exhaustion.
Both sides took severe damage with the Germans losing 9 SP and the Soviets losing 10 SP. Those numbers are prior to recovery - they will automatically regain 1/3 and lose 1/3 permanently.
I fought this battle Friday morning and I'm still not sure how to proceed.
As I see it, I have three main options.
Option 1: Leave the forces where they are on the campaign map with neither unit able to move next turn. Then fight the battle again with the now reduced forces. This seems realistic enough but it concerns me from a long term campaign perspective. It's only day two. I'd hate for one of these units to kneecapped on the third day.
Option 2: Both sides are forced to withdraw away from each other / towards their baselines, as if they lost, on the campaign map. Next turn they can move normally. Since they withdraw two spaces if they lose, they wouldn't be able to fight each other right away. This feels gamey but preserves both forces a little longer.
Option 3: Fight the local battles for the two hills - one between 5th Panzer Grenadier and the Soviet Pioneer battalion and one between 2nd Panzer and the 6th Rifle Regiment.
My thought for the 3rd option is to zoom in a bit, and fight two battles, with maybe a single battalion with support for each side (say, using One Hour Wargames force lists and even an appropriate OHW scenario). I am not sure how or if I would count losses towards the campaign - not a huge fan of carrying fractional Strength Points forward.
And, in the event of a split decision, I'm not sure what that would mean for the campaign map - it'd be the same situation.
It's OK if the Germans get stuck here trying to break through of course. So, if the goal is only to see who ends up controlling the hills/campaign map space perhaps either of the first two make more sense?
The Soviets are defending very well! What I do when faced with a command decision dilemma is think of a range of options of what the local commanders might do. E.g the Soviet commander might stubbornly elect to hang on (screaming, probably in vain, for reinforcements), or he might retire a short distance and prepare to meet the Hitlerites on a fresh field. You might add in an option IF the Germans pull back, the Soviets MIGHT follow up. The Germans might be offered the same options. Roll to see who decides first. Suppose it's the Soviets. Since it's not clear yet that the Germans are quitting the field, if the Soviets roll 'to follow up', that just means they're sticking around.
ReplyDeleteIf in turn the Germans also roll to follow up, it means they too will remain on the field. If there is to be a second day's battle, the result of which is to batter both formations to pieces, I think that is actually quite realistic for this campaign. The Germans would have to fall back a space and there remain on the defensive, the decision being left to the other formations to achieve.
Anyway, that's just me 'thinking out loud'. As you have shown, there are all sorts of ways to resolve such dilemmas.
Cheers,
Ion
Excellent suggestions, Ion, thank you! This approach really appeals to me, as it provides an opportunity for some higher level considerations, allows for surprise (on my part since I am not predetermining what will happen on the campaign map) and feels more organic than approaching it in terms of mechanics as I was doing.
DeleteA tense and very exciting battle John! Good luck with your choice of options!
ReplyDelete